Delivering bad news is often a difficult task for any professional, whether it’s for a doctor delivering a difficult medical diagnosis to a patient or an employee telling their boss about an impending project delay. In either case, proper ethics must be observed when delivering this type of news. So, which of the following statements about the ethics of delivering bad news is most accurate?
Euro News Top Internet portal: euronewstop.co.uk - interesting, up to date, worldwide!
The most accurate statement is that it should always be done in person and with sensitivity. While in some cases it may not be possible to deliver bad news in person (for example, if the party receiving the news is far away), whenever possible, it should still be done face-to-face as much as possible. Having an actual conversation allows both parties to exchange thoughts and feelings in a way that cannot be achieved through any other medium such as the telephone or email. In addition, this type of interaction creates an atmosphere of trust between the two people involved, making them feel more comfortable with each other during what could otherwise become a stressful time.
When delivering bad news, especially when dealing with sensitive issues such as medical diagnoses or project delays, it’s also important to not sugarcoat things too much but also try to remain sensitive at the same time. It’s important that those affected by this information are still given enough detail so they can understand exactly what needs to happen going forward — but don’t bombard them unnecessarily with too much information straight away either, as this could only make matters worse for everyone involved. To reduce the impact on those affected by difficult information, phrases like "I’m sorry" or "It must not have been easy for you" can go a long way towards showing sympathy and understanding while still providing enough relevant information they need to hear in order to get across your message effectively without adding unnecessary stress to them all at once.
Overall then, when considering which statement about the ethics of delivering bad news is most accurate, it seems clear from all points discussed above that providing honest and direct communication but with empathy and sensitivity will always provide the best outcome for all parties involved overall — allowing those affected by difficult situations to know just what needs to happen without coming off too harsh on their emotions at any one point either.